miércoles, 6 de febrero de 2013

John Keane "The age of mega projects"


En este post subimos la entrevista original que realizó la periodista  Elena Ortega,  El País,  a John Keane. Esta entrevista salió publicada el 22 de enero en español con el título de "La historia de amor con los megaproyectos ha acabado en miseria"

 

You said in your recent public speech in Castellon that we’re now living in the age of mega-projects. What exactly did you mean by this?

In Europe as elsewhere, we’ve entered times marked by big-footprint projects, organised efforts to do things never before attempted, adventures of power that touch and transform the lives of millions of people and their bio-habitats, in unprecedented ways. These ‘megaprojects’ include under-sea tunnels, mining operations, inter-city high-speed railway networks, new airports and airport extensions. They comprise entertainment complexes, nuclear power stations, banking and credit sector experiments and new communications and weapons systems. Megaprojects are distinguished by their astronomical design and construction costs (their price tag is often well in excess of a billion euros). Their complexity, scale and deep impact upon communities of people and their environment are also striking.


What have been the consequences of mega-projects in the region of Valencia?

My impressions are naturally those of an outsider, but the impact of projects such as the lavish opera house Valencia and the white elephant Castellon airport, is plain to see, and typical of what happens in the age of mega-projects. Megaprojects create jobs and measurable wealth, scientific-technical know-how and improved services. Many make our lives easier; the invention of the Internet by ARPA is proof positive of that. Often a source of local and national pride, they can generate large profits, but even when no golden harvest results they add hugely to the private fortunes of their designers, owners, managers and shareholders. As Senor Calatrava knows, megaprojects make some people mega-rich. But mega-projects also go wrong.

What are the symptoms of failure? 
Unless they are subject to strict public controls, mega-projects often have damaging effects. During their design and execution phases, they suffer construction problems, budget blow-outs and delayed completion schedules. London’s Olympic Games is a case in point: its bid was originally costed at £2.37 billion; the probable final cost will be around £24 billion. Spain’s love affair with mega-projects, notably in the field of construction, saddled the country with an estimated 100 billion euros of toxic debt. It’s probably much more than that. When up and running, mega-projects are plagued by chronic operation problems and ‘normal accidents’. Sometimes the mishaps do irreparable damage. Hence the household names: the Bhopal gas and chemical leak, nuclear meltdown at Chernobyl and Fukushima, gigantic oil spills courtesy of the Exxon Valdez and Deepwater Horizon, the collapse of Lehman Brothers and Bankia.
Such disasters are growing in number and frequency. I’m afraid that unless things change we’re heading into a grim future, one in which risky power experiments have catastrophic effects on the lives of millions of people and their habitats.

Do you see signs of the failure of mega-projects in Valencia, and Spain more generally?
The behind-the-scenes, poorly-regulated patron-client links forged between the Spanish cajas, the construction industry and big-budget regional governments have had heart-breaking effects. Their wild love affair ended in misery. The regional government of Valencia, proportionately the most indebted in the whole of Spain, is broke. Its debt is an estimated 25 billion euros. The region is littered with ghost towns, unfinished construction projects and an airport with no planes or passengers. Throughout the country, there is understandably great disaffection among many citizens. Half of under 25s are out of work. An estimated one and a half million people have to decide each day between eating or paying their bills. Perhaps 300,000 young graduates have left Spain since the onset of the crisis. All this is very bad for the spirit and substance of democracy.

Why are they bad for democracy?
It’s not just that the near-collapse of your banking system and the current politics of enforced austerity are damaging the daily lives of many millions of citizens. There’s something else just as sinister: megaprojects resemble sizeable tumours of arbitrary power within the body politic of democracy. They usually defy the familiar rhythm of elections. Details of their design, financing, construction and operation are typically decided from above. Especially when it comes to military and commercial megaprojects, things are decided in strictest secrecy, with virtually no monitoring by parliaments, outside watchdog groups or voting citizens. Unless they’re subject to strict and independent public monitoring, mega-projects do away with democratic procedures. They resemble forms of emergency rule in the heartlands of democracy.

Cases of corruption are common in Valencia. Does the absence of monitoring promote it?
Yes. Corruption went viral. It’s true that megaprojects often fail to measure up to the lavish claims made in their defence because of a variety of factors and forces. Simple human miscalculation; the blind arrogance and groupthink of those in charge; inadequate ‘hedging’ for surprise events; bad decisions caused by poor co-ordination and diffused responsibility chains; systematic lying (what policy analysts call ‘strategic misinformation’); and unintended chain reactions all play their part in ensuring that when things go wrong, they really go wrong.

The gargantuan size and hyper-complexity of mega-projects make matters worse. But substantial evidence is mounting (the Danish sociologist Bent Flyvbjerg has done the ground-breaking research) that the root cause of mega-project corruption, the key source of their failure, is their refusal of robust internal and external public scrutiny. Not all disasters are human and megaprojects don’t always fail, it’s true. Yet when they do fail, in 90% of cases, the main cause is the privatisation of power. Those in charge of operations suppose, mistakenly, that their mega-organisations can be governed in silence – silence within and outside the organisation.

There’s something really paradoxical about this silence. It’s produced, usually through intensive public relations campaigns which have the effect of cocooning the mega-project from rigorous public scrutiny. Lots of positive things are said publicly about the project, despite the fact that they’re often untrue. In all this, journalists often play along. A rich diet of promises of access, sinecures and over-dependence on official handouts renders them obedient. They become ‘plane spotters’, captive cheerleaders of mega-projects, silent cogs in their machinery of compliance.

What can citizens do? 
There’s a developing crisis of parliamentary democracy in Spain, so it’s the duty of citizens to become wiser and more determined, to pay attention to matters of folly, corruption and injustice, to speak out whenever and wherever necessary. Ancient Greek democrats cherished parrhesia: bold, frank, courageous speaking out publicly in defence of the common good. Every actually existing democracy now needs a good dose of parrhesia. Spain is no exception.
   
How would you describe the state of democracy in Valencia and Spain?
Twice during the past century, Spain stood at a political crossroad. The present situation clearly differs from the collapse of the republic during the 1930s, or the moment during the late 1970s when fascist dictatorship crumbled. Spain is at a new crossroads. Its citizens and representatives face a fundamental choice. They can continue down the road that leads nowhere, towards a bad-tempered, highly unequal phantom democracy whose key political institutions are distrusted and many citizens feel disaffected. Or Spain can embrace a fairer and more just society protected by a vigorous form of monitory democracy (democracia monitorizada). In other words, a new type of democracy in which there are not just free and fair elections, but where citizens and their representatives also practise the art of publicly exposing and humbling arbitrary power (poder abitrario), wherever it exists. For this to happen, much will have to change. Spanish electoral laws, which produce unfair outcomes, will need serious revision. New political parties led by honest representatives will be needed; the present two-party duopoly is choking Spain. A new compromise about the past, a fresh regional settlement and a greener and more equitable politics of inter-generational justice are priorities. And public silences will have to be broken. The basic political mistake of the past several decades mustn’t be repeated. Hereon, businesses, banks and governing institutions at all levels must be kept humble, trusted and respected only because their power is subject to permanent public scrutiny and, ultimately, to the active consent of all citizens. 

lunes, 21 de enero de 2013

John Keane cierra su semana en la Universitat Jaume I con una gran conferencia sobre los peligros de los "megaproyectos"



El destacado teórico político John Keane, director del recién creado Institute for Democracy and Human Right (IDHR) y uno de los grandes teóricos sobre democracia y sociedad civil, nos ha visitado durante la semana del 14 de enero en la que ha participado en varios seminarios así como en una conferencia abierta al público de Castellón. 

Los seminarios se centraron en el debate, con investigadores del Departamento de Filosofía y Sociología y el Departamento de Ciencias de Comunicación, sobre el futuro y las posibilidad de la democracia monitorizada así como lo que el autor llama “the greening of democracy”.

En la conferencia pública el teórico centró su intervención, ante una sala abarrotada, sobre las consecuencias y peligros que tiene para la población lo que denomina como los megaproyectos. Un fenómeno común en múltiples contextos –y no ajeno, ni mucho menos, al panorama español- donde existe una auténtica fiebre política por construir grandes túneles, redes ferroviarias de alta velocidad, aeropuertos, etc., cuya construcción transforma vidas de millones de personas y que, en ocasiones, provocan resultados catastróficos como el derrumbe de Bankia.

El teórico político habló en su conferencia del miércoles 16 de enero sobre las consecuencias desastrosas de estos grandes proyectos, en los que están implicados tanto Estados como empresas. Además de las consecuencias medioambientales, Keane señaló que los megaproyectos ocurren fuera de los parlamentos, están en manos del “poder arbitrario” y quedan fuera del control democrático. Por otra parte, también aseguró que estos megaproyectos están causando los grandes desastres que nos están llevando a la era de las catástrofes de consecuencias globales, como fueron los casos de Lehman Brothers, Fukushima o el vertido de BP Oil en el Golfo de México. Keane está convencido de que “cuando estos megaproyectos van mal la razón suele ser muy clara, la estrecha relación que existe entre el regulador y los directivos de esas grandes compañías”.
Ante toda esta serie de problemas, el profesor Keane aboga por la monitorización de la democracia como la “mejor manera de prevenir catástrofes”. El teórico concluyó, además, que el silencio público es el mayor peligro para la democracia.



La conferencia puede verse en su totalidad en el siguiente VIDEO (Grabado por el Servei de Comunicacio i Publicacions de la uji)

Durante esta semana John Keane ha atendido a numerosos medios de comunicación.



 

viernes, 11 de enero de 2013

Democracia, poder y medios de comunicación: la información que no llega. Conferencia próximo miércoles 16 de enero

El prestigioso filósofo australiano John Keane dará una charla sobre democracia, medios de comunicación y participación ciudadana en lo que será la inauguración del IV Ciclo de conferencias La democracia hoy: el fin de la representación. El evento tendrá lugar el próximo miércoles 16 de Enero a las 19h en el Centro Social San Isidro de la Caja Rural Castellón (Calle Enmedio, 49) y lleva por título Democracy and the Dangers of Silence. En la conferencia Keane hablará de la estrecha relación que existe entre democracia y periodismo así como los problemas actuales que afectan a los medios de comunicación, incidiendo en especial en los casos en los que cierta información se mantiene entre bastidores y por tanto es ocultada a la opinión pública.
John Keane es un destacado teórico político cuyo trabajo se ha centrado en la sociedad civil, la democracia y los medios de comunicación. Actualmente, es director del recién fundado Institute for Democracy and Human Rights (IDHR). Entre sus numerosas publicaciones destacan: The Media and Democracy (1991), Democracia y sociedad civil (1998), The Life and Death of Democracy (2009). El London Times lo ha catalogado como uno de los principales pensadores y escritores políticos considerando su trabajo de “importancia mundial.
En 2013 saldrá publicado por Cambridge University Press su nuevo trabajo bajo el título "Media decadence and democracy" en el cual analiza el papel del periodismo en la democracia.


Organizado por Departamento de Filosofía y Sociología de la UJI, esta cuarta edición del Ciclo de conferencias La democracia hoy: el fin de la representación completará su programa con las charlas de Paul Dekker (Catedrático Tilburg University & The Netherlands Institute for Social Research | SCP) bajo el título Challenges for representative democracy el próximo 29 de Abril 2013, y la de Simon Tormey (Catedrático The University of Sydney) Not in mine Name el próximo 19 de Junio. 

Conferencia será impartida en inglés y es abierta al público.
 Nota de prensa elaborada por: Oriol Grau (ElMolíEspaiViu)

jueves, 10 de enero de 2013

"Unamuno. Una paradoja viviente". Conferencia impartida por Carmen Ferrete en el Ateneo de Castellón


Nuestra compañera Carmen Ferrete Sarriá impartirá el próximo viernes 11 de enero de 2013 una conferencia sobre Unamuno.  La conferencia tiene como título "Unamuno. Una paradoja viviente" y se llevará a cabo en el Ateneo de Castellón a las 19.30.

La conferencia es abierta al público.

Carmen Ferrete es doctora en Filosofía moral. Profesora en el IES. Álvaro Falomir de Almazora y profesora asociada de la Universitat Jaume I de Castellón. Entre la publicaciones de Carmen Ferrete cabe destacar su libro: Ética ecológica como ética aplicada. Educación cívica y responsabilidad ecológica, (Ciencias Sociales, 2010).


miércoles, 12 de diciembre de 2012

Conferencia de John Keane “Democracy and the Dangers of Silence”


El próximo 16 de enero de 2013, el filósofo australiano John Keane ofrecerá en Castellón una conferencia sobre  los peligros del silencio en democracia.

Esta conferencia se enmarca dentro IV Ciclo de conferencias “La democracia hoy: el fin de la representación”
John Keane es un destacado teórico político cuyo trabajo se ha centrado en la sociedad civil, la democracia y los medios de comunicación. Actualmente, es director del recién fundado Institute for Democracy and Human Rights (IDHR) -The University of Sydney.

Entre sus numerosas publicaciones destacan: The Media and Democracy (1991), Democracia y sociedad civil (1998), Tom Paine: A Political Life (1995) Václav Havel: A Political Tragedy in Six Acts (1999), Global Civil Society? (2003),Violence and Democracy (2004). En 2009 ha publicado una de sus obras más destacadas: The Life and Death of Democracy.   

SYNOPSIS: We are living in a new era of large-scale catastrophes whose causes, ruinous effects and remedies demand bold new thinking about the way manufactured public silence operates as the currency of power. Calamities such as Fukushima, Deepwater Horizon and the recent near-collapse of Atlantic-region banks and credit institutions, John Keane argues, force us to reconsider the meaning of democracy and the inherited reasons why the old European ideal of freedom of communication is desirable – far more precious than our ancestors could possibly have imagined.

ORGANIZA: Departamento de Filosofía y Sociología. Universidad Jaume I de Castellón.
Dentro del proyecto de investigación del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación: “Aportación de la neuroeconomía a la dimensión éticadel diseño institucional” (FFI2010-21639-C02-02).

DATOS DEL EVENTO: 
16 de enero de 2013
Caja Rural Castellón, Centro Social San Isidro. Calle Enmedio, 49.
19.00
ABIERTO AL PÚBLICO